images©  &  text©   by  Jennifer  McKendry                                home page

Equipment: a good digital camera with zoom lens and flash); one or more studio lights on stand or with a clamp; good picture processing software in your computer; optional portable backdrops (scaled to miniatures and/or dollhouses); good colour printer with high quality photographic paper if you want to print the results; optional good scanner; optional black or coloured fabric to drape over object when scanning.


Objectives: pictures which combine aesthetic appeal with clarity; for certain pictures, to create the impression "you are there", whereas other pictures are to provide as much factual information as possible


One needs to take some time to compose the scene and decide the angles to shoot from both as the photographer (holding the camera above the scene, level with the scene - which creates the "you are there" effect, etc.) and how the miniature is positioned (parallel, foreshortened, side view, end view, etc.). Are there accessories that may make the scene or main object more life-like or interesting? such as dogs, cats, people, lamps, dishes, bouquets etc. see picture below right


I have the best results when combining the camera’s flash with one traditional, studio flood-light directed at an angle (the angle makes the scene more natural as in the sun’s directional rays below right). Sometimes sunlight hitting the object works (picture of dollhouse near the bottom of this article) but other times it creates too strong a contrast between highlights and shadows.


photo6.jpg (36975 bytes) 

photo7.jpg (32524 bytes) 


 on the left, flat lighting falls on the doll in an uncropped picture while, on the right, angled lighting wraps around her, she is in a more interesting pose and close cropped - giving the impression "you are there", in part because the camera is at the same level as the subject; distracting elements in the background were cloned out creating a dark shaded area merging into the middle ground


 For each image, I take 10 to 20 shots using both the “automatic” setting, which forces me quite a distance from the subject (or else there is a focus problem) and “scene” (a close-up setting, which may have a different name in other cameras), which makes you move very close to the subject, although the focus can be hard to control.


The results aren’t all that predictable and so I am prepared to retake after unloading the shots into my computer and critically judging them on my computer screen. Therefore, do not disassemble your scene until you are certain you have a satisfactory image.


I could use a cable release and tripod but find it awkward with tiny objects, even though I have a mini tripod, as well as a regular one. I like the flexibility and speed of moving the camera to different heights and angles without stopping to adjust a tripod. Grip the camera firmly, brace yourself and suck in your breath to minimize shaking, which will cause the image to be out of focus.


The automatic setting means you may have to crop away a lot of the setup (because you may be far away from the miniatures depending upon how your camera works), which decreases the potential pixels available for what is left (A below). If you have used the fine or high function (with my camera, the results per picture are about 6 MB, which may be cropped down to perhaps 3 MB), this may not be a problem, especially if you want the image for the web. I save the cropped 3 MB image but, in addition, I resize it (“save as” and then find “resize” or"image dimensions" under "options": pick a "custom" size such as 800 pixels wide) under a different file name (in order to preserve the higher resolution image) to a maximum of about 800 pixels wide (the other dimension adjusts automatically; my webtables are 800 pixels wide) or less if still too large for web use or unnecessary for the small size you may want for a particular image on your web page – for the Gallery of Images, each image is about 60 to 350 KB. On the other hand, detail and clarity are important in portraying miniatures. For other articles, the web images have even less KBs for speed in appearing to the user. For use in a publication such as a newsletter or when making prints, you need high resolution: use the 3 MB version you severely cropped on “automatic” or 6MB with slight cropping if on “scene”.


One problem is an object obscuring other objects in a miniature scene. This may only be apparent once you look at the result on your computer screen. I then have to go back, make adjustments and re-shoot. I may turn one chair from a set to face the viewer (so that it can be more easily identified by the website user example shown below under discussion about background panels), even though the rest are in more natural positions, for example pulled into a table. Items may need to be placed in contrived positions and angles in order to be seen.


Also a tiny object foreshortened may look illegible in the final image, for example a little dog seen butt end may have looked cute when you were arranging the scene but a question mark in the final product. Again one has to re-shoot the scene after making adjustments.


Once the picture is downloaded into your computer, you still need to rotate (by a quarter turn if needed to position vertically or by one or more degrees to create a level horizon), crop, as well as adjust tint, light/dark and contrast to create the most effective final image. With some picture software, the automatic feature for adjusting the latter three can produce good results. Further changes, particularly in cropping, may be needed once you drop the image into place on the website.

photo10.jpg (21225 bytes)

I have been experimenting with scanning selected objects - especially if they are very tiny or detailed and if the 3-deminsional aspect is not too important (right, 1½ inches wide). The advantage is the sharp final image. I place them on the glass of the scanner and then drape them with black cloth (as my background in the Gallery is black). I scan close cropped at a high resolution (800 to 1600 dpi if tiny). The black appears grey in places because of the intense light of the scanner. I then have to (after rotating, cropping, adjusting contrast, colour and saving) paint in the black to get rid of highlights.  I sometimes find the outer edges of what looks like a black background still show a glimmer of white when dropped into place on the website. I then have to repaint them with black in that area or crop in slightly. If you want a white background, you go with white cloth, paint etc. or drape with coloured cloth. I am careful about letting the picture software automatically adjust the bright and contrast when saving the scanned item – it sometimes destroys a warm tone that I like.


I use cloning whenever it is need to make a picture more legible or increase its impact. I expect there are various views on whether this is ethical. One little bureau was missing its top horizontal board, which I will someday replace. In the meanwhile, I “created” it with cloning for my web image (below). Or a metal item with badly chipped paint may “magically” have some paint restored. I also like to crop tightly and wipe out (with paint or cloning or both) extraneous parts of historical catalogue ads – again possibly an ethical issue (further below).


photo4.jpg (69511 bytes)photo5.jpg (66003 bytes) 













                    before cropping and cloning                                                     after cropping and cloning (note top horizontal board)


photo12.jpg (44313 bytes)photo13.jpg (7089 bytes)scan of an ad of 1922 showing misc. dollhouse items versus tightly cropped ad of a bathroom set; if the small ad is the subject, I scan just for it at a much higher dpi (800 to 1600 dpi) than the overall page (400 dpi) - this results in a higher quality image in comparison to cropping the small ad out of the scan containing the page



 Another possibility is making background panels, which can be adjusted for various scenes (below). Boards or strong cardboard can be covered with various wallpapers with patterns appropriate to the scale of miniatures being photographed (applied to both sides of the panel but with a different pattern on each side to increase the variety of backgrounds); usually a maximum of 12” high by whatever width you want (they represent the walls of a room). At least 2 are desirable so that you can create corner. They need to be supported by leaning against a wall or be thick enough to be self-supporting. The “floor” can be a wooden table-top.


photo9.jpg (35820 bytes)photo8.jpg (27722 bytes) 









left: using background panels, which appear as walls when close cropped (right); one chair is turned to face the viewer to help in identifying it; the dog is legible in this profile, slightly angled view whereas he is hard to comprehend if foreshortened


I have thought of using large 3-panel “hinged” art display foam boards (available in office supply stores) in white or black to place behind dollhouses, which otherwise may have too busy a background. I have painted out such backgrounds but it is a lot of work. Even with the foam boards, you will need to touch up the background with paint to eliminate the hinge lines and even out the shadows and highlights created by the camera flash and studio light but it is less work than painting around every detail of the subject's edges.


Whether or not to paint out the background (usually in white unless the website background happens to be black) can be decided case-by-case. I do this either to clarify the object because the background is too confusing or for aesthetic reasons. Variety may be more interesting than everything appearing with its real background or everything with a monotone background. Depending upon your picture software, you may find painting easier than trying to outline by cropping, especially when there are lots of curves and small spaces. Remember to zoom in when painting a difficult area. You may have a combination of real and painted backgrounds in the same picture, for example, a stable in a farm scene setup on a table may have, in the backdrop, vegetation, buildings, animals etc. and thus look natural but a part of the background might also show the rest of the real room, which would be less distracting if painted out. Or a dollhouse may be more emphatic if there are fewer distractions in the background and if there is less contrast in scale between the real room and the dollhouse (below).


photo2.jpg (15341 bytes)photographing3.jpg (31572 bytes) 

                     the original photograph                                                        after cropping and then painting out the background


photo11.jpg (9135 bytes)Backgrounds can also be created with using fabric draped over boxes (if different heights are wanted such as with a set of dishes right; the boxes are hidden below the fabric). Velvet or felt are the most forgiving of creases; velvet creates nice highlights and shadows.


So, all in all, it is a time consuming, hard process! And a “learn as you go”. Although folks are inclined to assume your success all depends upon what camera you use, that is only one aspect. There is as much work in processing the picture in the computer as there is in taking the picture.

   top of page             home page              history of DOLLHOUSES

 GALLERY of IMAGES 1       DOLLS for DOLLHOUSES 1        list of articles on antiques